<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>/scratch/scupper &#187; classaction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scupper.net/scratch/tag/classaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scupper.net/scratch</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stockton woman&#8217;s lawsuit challenges Comcast&#8217;s set top rental</title>
		<link>http://scupper.net/scratch/2008/12/28/stockton-womans-lawsuit-challenges-comcasts-set-top-rental/</link>
		<comments>http://scupper.net/scratch/2008/12/28/stockton-womans-lawsuit-challenges-comcasts-set-top-rental/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cystdog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[scratch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cablecard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scupper.net/scratch/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Californian Latest To File Potential Class-Action Set-Top Suit Suit Challenges Comcast&#8217;s Equipment Rental Arrangement By Linda Haugsted &#8212; Multichannel News, 12/24/2008 ©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. excerpt&#8230;. The suits note that premium video and the set-top descramblers are two distinct products, yet the cable providers require that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6625004.html?nid=4262">Californian Latest To File Potential Class-Action Set-Top Suit </a><br />
<em><small>Suit Challenges Comcast&#8217;s Equipment Rental Arrangement<br />
By Linda Haugsted &#8212; Multichannel News, 12/24/2008<br />
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</small></em></p>
<p>excerpt&#8230;.</p>
<blockquote><p><em><small><small>The suits note that premium video and the set-top descramblers are two distinct products, yet the cable providers require that the hardware be rented from cable companies, rather than permitting consumers to purchase the set-top hardware in the open market.</small></small></em></p>
<p><em><small><small>Owing to such tying arrangements, &#8220;In a matter of months, the rental fees that the class is supposed to pay for the cable boxes &#8230; greatly exceeds their worth,&#8221; according to the California suit. The charges add up quickly if a consumer has multiple sets in the home hooked up to premium services, the suit notes. </small></small></em></p>
<p><em><small><small>The lawsuit also duns Comcast for touting the rental of cable boxes over the use of the CableCARD, the latter of which is to take the place of set-top hardware. Even is a consumer decides to get a CableCARD to plug into a digital set, that hardware must be rented from Comcast, too, according to the suit.</small></small></em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scupper.net/scratch/2008/12/28/stockton-womans-lawsuit-challenges-comcasts-set-top-rental/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
